← Back to Becoming

Behind the Paper

Growth & Gratitude

From Awe to Wellness

How my first undergraduate publication helped me discover what I enjoy about research—and how much I still have to learn.

A runner on a coastal nature trail in soft morning light

01 / The journey

Publication Timeline

  1. Data collection began.

  2. Submitted to Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being.

  3. Received feedback about text similarity; revised the manuscript and resubmitted.

  4. Received a revise-and-resubmit decision from The Journal of Positive Psychology.

  5. Submitted the first revised manuscript.

  6. Received a second round of revisions and conditional acceptance.

  7. Submitted the second revised manuscript.

  8. Accepted.

  9. Published online.

02 / People who make a difference

With Gratitude

A first step into research

This was my first paper published during my undergraduate studies. As a co-first author, I was fortunate to work closely with Prof. Cheng and to be deeply involved in data collection and analysis, writing, and revision under his guidance.

I still remember being in my third year of university, trying to work out which path I wanted to take in the future. My reason for approaching my supervisor about research was simple: “I want to find out what doing research is like, whether I am suited to it, and whether I enjoy it.”

My answer now is: “I enjoy it—about 80%. Whether I am suited to it is a question I still cannot answer with certainty.”

Learning with encouragement

Much of that early affection for research grew from the careful, patient guidance I received when I was only beginning to find my way into it. Prof. Cheng guided me almost step by step, explaining what we needed to do next and why a particular study should be designed in a certain way.

I also remember writing an Introduction for the first time. It was during the May Day holiday. I drafted an outline, and my supervisor talked it through with me on a voice call, helping me adjust the logic of the argument. After I finished, he encouraged me: “For a first attempt, this is already very good!” I felt encouraged.

Throughout the revisions to the initial draft, opening a Word document full of red tracked changes often brought two feelings at once. I was deeply touched by his conscientious guidance, but I also felt a little ashamed or guilty. I wanted to do better—to strengthen my abilities and lighten the burden on my supervisor.

What support taught me

One moment has stayed with me. We submitted the paper during the summer after my third year, just as I was preparing for recommendation-based postgraduate admissions. I was anxiously reviewing core subjects, practicing spoken English, and attending university interviews. Soon after submission, the journal flagged the manuscript for a high similarity score, largely because of unavoidable overlap in the Methods section. I revised the wording several times, but the score returned by the journal’s system still did not fall, so I turned to my supervisor for help.

He said he would try working on it himself and told me to focus on my own preparations while he took care of it. I was very moved by that—perhaps especially because of the situation I was in at the time. His example has quietly shaped the kind of collaborator I hope to become. In future projects, when a collaborator is too busy to manage everything, I want to step forward, share the work, and help carry it through.

We also saw how much he contributed during the later revise-and-resubmit process. Having him there gave me a strong sense of security: I knew there was someone I could rely on when things became difficult. That support did not mean I could be careless. Precisely because I had been supported so thoughtfully, I wanted even more to become capable in my own right—to grow from someone who needs others’ support into a scholar who can take responsibility for a research project independently and offer support to collaborators as well.

By now, you may be wondering why I have spent so much space praising my supervisor. My answer is simply that he deserves it! I often feel extraordinarily lucky. I do not think our abilities are necessarily all that different. Having the good fortune to meet a mentor willing to guide me is a large part of why my research journey seemed to move a little “faster” during my undergraduate years.

The friends who began with me

I am also deeply grateful to the friends who let me “recruit” them into trying research together as undergraduates. Our story began in the first semester of our third year. I wanted to see how research actually worked, so I persuaded you to give it a try with me. We discussed all kinds of research ideas—some so scattered, and even a little “silly” in hindsight.

Many of those ideas never became actual studies. Still, the hours we spent searching the literature, discussing questions, and repeatedly starting over were how we first began to approach research.

Five or ten years from now, we may not all be pursuing academic careers. We may be working in entirely different industries and living in different cities. But I believe each of us will contribute in our own way, find our own paths, and become who we truly want to be.

03 / Learning along the way

What This Journey Taught Me

Learning research methods by doing

The most immediate gains were in basic research skills. Through learning by doing, I encountered and learned to use cross-lagged panel models (CLPM), random-intercept cross-lagged panel models (RI-CLPM), and longitudinal data analysis.

Building the ability to work through difficult problems

Revising a paper is a demanding learning process. Repeatedly rewriting the manuscript, responding to questions, and strengthening the argument gradually trained my reasoning, my ability to follow through, and my capacity to solve complex problems.

Leaving enough time for publication

This experience also taught me that it is essential to leave enough time for publication. I had seen many master’s and doctoral students share their anxiety online about approaching graduation while their papers were still waiting to appear, sometimes with possible consequences for their graduation timelines.

For this paper, roughly half a year passed between submission and the first round of review comments. That will vary by journal, of course, but the time spent waiting for review and publication is difficult to control. Whether the goal is a PhD application, graduation, or another milestone that requires research outputs, it is wise to begin projects as early as possible.

Understanding the direction I wanted to pursue

Doing research as an undergraduate also helped me greatly during the postgraduate admissions process. Reading across different research areas and engaging deeply with one field made it much clearer which direction I wanted to pursue and what I enjoyed. I did not feel I had to apply indiscriminately to every area. It also gave me the courage to prefer receiving no offers at all over accepting a direct-entry PhD offer in a field that did not interest me.

04 / Looking ahead

Where I Still Need to Grow

Developing my own research ideas

The first area is developing research ideas. The idea for this paper came from my supervisor. To be honest, having a publication does not yet make me feel that I “understand research” or fully know how to do it. The idea is at the heart of a project, and this is an ability I still need to strengthen.

My supervisor once described two main routes to an idea:

From observations

Notice phenomena in everyday life and turn them into research questions.

From the literature

Develop new ideas through reading and engaging with existing research.

Both routes require extensive reading. If I notice an interesting phenomenon or topic in everyday life, I can begin by identifying relevant variables and searching the literature. A literature review should help me work through questions such as these:

  • How far has research on this topic progressed?
  • What do researchers currently agree on?
  • What are its antecedents and consequences?
  • Which questions remain unanswered?

These questions need to be mapped out systematically. Only then should I assess whether an idea is worth pursuing and whether it can be studied in practice.

Strengthening my writing in English

The second area is writing in English. AI is increasingly capable, but learning to write well remains an essential skill for someone who hopes to become a scholar. I want to study the structure of arguments and the use of language in papers from leading journals more closely.

Over the next month, my goal is to examine at least one paper in depth. Please don’t dismiss the goal as too small—I want to start by actually doing it.

Of course, these are not the only areas in which I need to grow. I still find myself impatient at times, and I need to give more time to reading, thinking, and letting ideas develop. Becoming an independent scholar is still a very, very, very long road for me. I hope to do more research that is both interesting and useful, and to share our future publications with you.

Written on